Severance tax is set by years served, not by the amount — how the same ₩100M severance became ₩264K or ₩10.36M
Retirement income is taxed separately from other income. A service-years deduction comes off first; the remainder is divided by years of service and multiplied by 12 to restore a one-year figure, the tax rate is applied, and the result is divided by 12 and multiplied by years of service again. Because of that conversion, the same ₩100M costs ₩10,360,625 after 5 years of service and ₩264,000 after 30.
Conditions used in the calculation
- Severance pay
- ₩100M (fixed, an assumption to isolate the tax structure)
- Years of service
- 5 · 10 · 20 · 30 years
- Service-years deduction table
- amended Dec 2022 · applies to retirements on or after 2023-01-01
- Type of severance
- ordinary severance (executive caps, annuity payout and interim settlements differ)
Results
- 5 years · ₩100M
- ₩10,360,625 (effective 10.36%)
- 30 years · ₩100M
- ₩264,000 (effective 0.26%)
- 10 years · ₩100M
- ₩4,262,500 (effective 4.26%)
- 20 years · ₩100M
- ₩1,232,000 (effective 1.23%)
- Gap between 5 and 30 years
- about 39×
- 20 years, computed without the conversion
- ₩9,504,000 (7.7× the correct figure)
At a glance
The table amended in December 2022, applying to retirements on or after 2023-01-01. If severance is below the deduction, the whole severance is deducted.
- 5 years₩5M
- 10 years₩15M
- 20 years₩40M
- 30 years₩70M
Why it works this way
Two people each receive ₩100M in severance. One pays ₩264,000 in tax; the other pays ₩10,360,625. The company is not different and neither is the amount. The only thing that differs is how long they worked there. The 30-year employee pays ₩264K; the 5-year employee pays ₩10.36M. Severance tax is set not by what you received but by how many years it is spread over.
Retirement income is classified income. It is calculated on its own, never added to wage or business income, and that is the end of it. Severance is thirty years of accrual paid out in the final year, not one year's earnings, while income tax is progressive, with higher rates on higher annual income. Count thirty years as one year's income and the rate jumps to the top bracket. So the law installs two devices: a deduction that grows with years served, and a conversion that spreads the money back out as if it were one year's pay. The tax looks small not as a favor but because the law refuses to count money earned over many years as if it were earned in one.
The first device is the service-years deduction, a fixed amount subtracted from severance according to years served: ₩5M at 5 years, ₩15M at 10, ₩40M at 20, ₩70M at 30. From the same ₩100M, the 5-year employee is left with ₩95M and the 30-year employee with ₩30M. One condition is attached: if severance is less than the deduction, the whole severance becomes the deduction. Receive ₩30M after 20 years and the ₩40M deduction absorbs all of it, leaving a tax base of ₩0 and tax of ₩0. This table was amended in December 2022 and applies to retirements on or after 1 January 2023.
After the service-years deduction, divide by years of service and multiply by 12: that is the converted pay. Apply the rate, then divide by 12 and multiply by years of service to convert back.
- Severance ₩100M− service-years deduction ₩40M = ₩60M
- Converted pay₩60M ÷ 20 × 12 = ₩36M
- Tax base₩11.2M after the converted-pay deduction × basic rates
- Convert backtax ÷ 12 × 20 = ₩1,120,000 · plus 10% local income tax = ₩1,232,000
Skip the conversion and apply the rates directly to ₩60M and you get ₩9,504,000, which is 7.7 times too much. When an online calculation is far from reality, this is usually the step it skipped.
The converted-pay deduction can also bring the tax to zero. Receive ₩50M after 20 years: ₩10M remains after the ₩40M service-years deduction. Divide by 20 and multiply by 12 and the converted pay is ₩6M. The converted-pay deduction covers everything up to ₩8M, so all ₩6M is deducted. Tax base ₩0, tax ₩0.
Back to the two people. The 5-year employee's deduction is only ₩5M, leaving ₩95M; divide by 5 and multiply by 12 and the converted pay is ₩228M. Spreading five years' worth over one year actually made it bigger. Hence ₩10,360,625 in tax, an effective rate of 10.36%. At 10 years it is ₩4,262,500 (4.26%), at 20 years ₩1,232,000 (1.23%), at 30 years ₩264,000 (0.26%). The gap between 5 and 30 years is about 39 times.
Severance fixed at ₩100M with only the years of service changing. The gap between 5 and 30 years is about 39×.
- 5 years (effective 10.36%)₩10,360,625
- 10 years (effective 4.26%)₩4,262,500
- 20 years (effective 1.23%)₩1,232,000
- 30 years (effective 0.26%)₩264,000
One easy misreading needs clearing up. Longer service does mean less tax, but the severance itself grows with service. Today's calculation fixed the severance at ₩100M to show the tax structure alone. Severance accrues at 30 days of average wages for every year worked, so longer service brings a larger severance, and a larger amount brings more tax. With the same 20 years of service, ₩200M costs ₩7,727,500 and ₩300M costs ₩19,844,000.
Three things are settled before you retire. First, years of service: the hire date and the planned leaving date are all it takes, and they also fix which row of the deduction table you fall in. Second, the rough size of the severance: average wages over the final three months are the base, and company rules or the retirement-pension balance give a good estimate. Third, once those two are set, the tax is set. And years of service cannot be added after you leave. A few months can move you into a different deduction band, so if you can choose your leaving date, run the numbers first.
Some people worry about filing. The law does say retirement income must be reported the following May, but there is a proviso: if the company withheld the severance tax before paying, that filing is not required. Most companies withhold, so there is usually nothing to do. If you received severance from several companies, or the company did not withhold, then you file yourself. Still, retirement is not a decision to make on tax alone. Tax is one number to feed into the decision, not the decision itself.
Two things to do now. First, check your hire date and count your years of service. Second, estimate your severance from your average wages over the last three months. Those two are enough to produce the tax. Today's story covers ordinary severance only: executive severance caps, retirement pensions taken as an annuity, and earlier interim settlements all change the calculation. For large amounts, have a tax adviser confirm.
The legal basis
Drawn from government announcements and the statutes themselves as primary sources, covering only the relevant part.
소득세법 제48조 제1항 제1호 (근속연수공제)
In force 2023-01-01 (Act No. 19196, promulgated 2022-12-31)
A fixed amount by years of service is deducted from retirement income: ₩1M × years up to 5; ₩5M + ₩2M × (years − 5) for 5 to 10; ₩15M + ₩2.5M × (years − 10) for 10 to 20; ₩40M + ₩3M × (years − 20) above 20. Under para. 2, if retirement income is below the deduction, the whole amount is deducted.
What this means
₩5M comes off at 5 years and ₩70M at 30. It grows by band the longer you stay, and if severance is below the deduction the tax is zero.
소득세법 제48조 제1항 제2호 (환산급여공제)
In force 2016-01-01 (Act No. 12852, promulgated 2014-12-23)
The amount after the service-years deduction is divided by years of service and multiplied by 12 to give converted pay, from which a banded deduction is taken: all of it up to ₩8M; ₩8M + 60% of the excess to ₩70M; ₩45.2M + 55% of the excess to ₩100M; ₩61.7M + 45% of the excess to ₩300M; ₩151.7M + 35% of the excess above ₩300M.
What this means
Money accrued over many years is restored to a one-year figure and deducted once more. Converted pay of ₩8M or less is fully deducted, so the tax is zero.
소득세법 제55조 제2항 (퇴직소득 산출세액)
In force In force (checked 2026-08-30)
The tax computed by applying the basic rates to the retirement-income tax base is divided by 12 and multiplied by years of service to give the assessed tax.
What this means
Convert, apply the rate, then convert back. Skip the conversion and the tax is off by multiples (7.7× on a 20-year ₩100M case).
소득세법 제71조 (퇴직소득 과세표준 확정신고)
In force In force (checked 2026-08-30)
A resident with retirement income must file a tax-base return the following May, except where the severance tax was withheld at source, among other cases.
What this means
If the company withheld the tax before paying, there is nothing to file. You file yourself only when severance came from several companies or was not withheld.
Run it on your own numbers
The calculator opens with these conditions already filled in. Change the figures and your own case comes straight out.
Open the Severance Pay Tax Calculator
Frequently asked
If longer service means less tax, is a long-serving employee always better off?
On tax structure alone, yes. But severance itself accrues at 30 days of average wages per year of service, so it grows with tenure. Today's example **fixed the severance at ₩100M**. With the same 20 years, ₩200M costs ₩7,727,500 and ₩300M costs ₩19,844,000.
Why is an online calculator giving me a very different number?
It usually skipped the **conversion**. Apply the rates directly to the ₩60M left after the deduction on a 20-year ₩100M case and you get ₩9,504,000. Converting with ÷20×12 gives the correct ₩1,232,000, a 7.7× gap.
What if my severance is smaller than the service-years deduction?
The whole severance becomes the deduction. Receive ₩30M after 20 years and, since that is below the ₩40M deduction, all ₩30M is deducted, leaving a tax base of ₩0 and tax of ₩0.
Do I have to file severance tax separately in May?
The law sets a May filing the following year, but **cases where the company withheld the tax are excluded** (Income Tax Act Art. 71). That covers most people. You file yourself only if you received severance from several companies or the company did not withhold.
Why are the deduction amounts in an older article different?
The service-years deduction table was amended in December 2022 and the new table (₩5M at 5 years · ₩15M at 10 · ₩40M at 20 · ₩70M at 30) applies to retirements on or after 1 January 2023. Articles computed on the old table show different numbers.
Results are estimates based on the inputs and on the rules as at the stated date. They may differ from a lender's actual assessment, and the rules change often. Take professional advice before any decision that matters.








