← Shorts explained

Same ₩1.3B in homes, comprehensive real estate tax of ₩69,121 vs ₩923,682: the order of the calculation

Two people each own homes with an official assessed price of ₩1.3B. Youngsook owns one ₩1.3B home; Mikyung owns two, ₩800M and ₩500M. This year's comprehensive real estate tax is ₩69,121 for Youngsook and ₩923,682 for Mikyung, more than 13 times apart. The difference comes from the order of the calculation, not the price. Four steps: who pays, how much is deducted, what rate applies, and how much is taken off at the end.

Rules as of 2026-10-08 · Sources: MOLEG statutes · ministry notices

Conditions used in the calculation

Cases
Youngsook: one ₩1.3B home · age 65 · held 10 years / Mikyung: two homes, ₩800M and ₩500M · ₩1.3B in total
Basis
2026 tax year (paid December 1 to 15, 2026) · law as of October 2026 · checked against the NTS Hometax simulator
Step 1 Who pays
Whoever owns the home on June 1 (the assessment date) · official assessed price, not market price · per person, not per family
Step 2 How much is deducted
₩1.2B if only one person in the household owns exactly one home · ₩900M per person otherwise · 60% of the remainder (fair market value ratio) is the tax base
Step 3 What rate applies
0.5% on a tax base up to ₩300M · up to 2.7% for two homes or fewer · up to 5% for three or more · subtract the overlapping property tax, add the 20% rural development tax
Step 4 What is taken off at the end
One-home households only · age 60+ 20% · 65+ 30% · 70+ 40% · held 5+ years 20% · 10 years 40% · 15 years 50% · combined up to 80%
Government proposal
Announced August 3, 2026 · not yet passed by the National Assembly · not included here

Results

Youngsook (one ₩1.3B home · 65 · 10 years)
₩69,121
Mikyung (₩800M + ₩500M, two homes)
₩923,682 · more than 13 times
Tax base
Youngsook ₩1.3B − ₩1.2B = ₩100M × 60% = ₩60M · Mikyung ₩1.3B − ₩900M = ₩400M × 60% = ₩240M · 4 times apart from the start
After the 0.5% rate
Youngsook ₩300,000 · Mikyung ₩1.2M
Overlapping property tax deducted
Youngsook ₩107,999, leaving ₩192,001 · Mikyung ₩430,265, leaving ₩769,735
Youngsook's credit 30 + 40 = 70%
₩57,601 + rural development tax ₩11,520 = ₩69,121
Mikyung's 20% rural development tax
₩769,735 + ₩153,947 = ₩923,682
If Youngsook were 45 and had held 3 years
₩230,401 · more than 3 times
A married couple splitting one ₩1.3B home
₩650M each · ₩900M deducted per person, so both pay ₩0 · a ₩300M difference in the deduction

At a glance

Tax base after the basic deduction

₩1.2B off for one home, ₩900M for two, then × 60%. 4 times apart from the start.

  • Youngsook (₩1.2B deduction)₩60M
  • Mikyung (₩900M deduction)₩240M

Why it works this way

Two people each own homes with an official assessed price of ₩1.3B. Youngsook owns one ₩1.3B home; her friend Mikyung owns two, ₩800M and ₩500M, for ₩1.3B in total. Same value, yet the comprehensive real estate tax is more than 13 times apart: ₩69,121 for Youngsook, ₩923,682 for Mikyung. The order of the calculation made the difference, not the price. The comprehensive real estate tax is a national tax on people who own expensive homes. Property tax is paid to the city or district for each home; this tax adds up every home one person owns and is paid to the national government. This year it is paid from December 1 to 15. There are four steps: who pays, how much is deducted, what rate applies, and how much is taken off at the end.

Step 1: who pays. The tax is paid by whoever owns the home on June 1, the assessment date. Sell on May 31 and collect the balance, and you do not pay that year's tax; the owner on June 1 is the buyer. The calculation uses the official assessed price published every year, not the market price, and the assessed price is usually lower. It is also calculated per person, not per family: a couple splitting one home does not add their shares together. Miss this and you might set the closing date for June 2, then pay a full year's tax on a home you sold one day too late.

Step 2: how much is deducted. The tax does not apply to the whole assessed price; a basic deduction comes off first. If only one person in the household owns exactly one home, it is ₩1.2B; otherwise ₩900M per person. One home assessed at ₩1.2B or less owes nothing. Then 60% of what remains, the fair market value ratio, becomes the tax base.

Step 2 tax base: 4 times apart from the start

Comprehensive Real Estate Holding Tax Act Art. 8 · Enforcement Decree Art. 2-4.

  1. Youngsook (one home)₩1.3B − ₩1.2B = ₩100M × 60% = ₩60M
  2. Mikyung (two homes)₩1.3B − ₩900M = ₩400M × 60% = ₩240M
  3. Couple splitting one ₩1.3B home₩650M each − ₩900M → both ₩0

Get one home vs. two wrong and the deduction is off by ₩300M.

Step 3: what rate applies. A tax base up to ₩300M is taxed at 0.5%. Larger amounts climb into higher brackets, up to 2.7% for two homes or fewer and up to 5% for three or more. Only the part in a higher bracket gets the higher rate. Youngsook's ₩60M and Mikyung's ₩240M are both in the first bracket at 0.5%: ₩300,000 and ₩1.2M. You pay property tax and this tax on the same home, but not twice on the same part: the overlapping property tax is subtracted. Entering Mikyung's case in the Hometax simulator subtracts ₩430,265, leaving ₩769,735. The rural development tax then adds 20% of the tax.

Step 3 Mikyung: from rate to rural development tax

Comprehensive Real Estate Holding Tax Act Art. 9 · Enforcement Decree Art. 4-3 · Special Tax for Rural Development Act Art. 5.

  1. ₩240M × 0.5%₩1.2M
  2. − overlapping property tax₩430,265 → ₩769,735
  3. + rural development tax 20%₩153,947
  4. Mikyung's tax₩923,682

Without knowing the overlapping property tax is subtracted, the bill looks lower than your own calculation and seems wrong.

Step 4: what is taken off at the end. Only households with exactly one home get this. Age 60 and over takes 20%, 65 and over 30%, 70 and over 40%; holding 5 years or more takes 20%, 10 years 40%, 15 years 50%. The two add up, to a maximum of 80%. Youngsook is 65 and has held 10 years: 30 plus 40, so 70% off. Mikyung owns two homes, so nothing comes off at this step.

Step 4 Youngsook: 70% off

Comprehensive Real Estate Holding Tax Act Art. 9, credit for one-home households.

  1. ₩60M × 0.5%₩300,000
  2. − overlapping property tax₩107,999 → ₩192,001
  3. − 70% (age 30 + holding 40)₩57,601
  4. + rural development tax₩11,520 → ₩69,121

If Youngsook were 45 and had held only 3 years, nothing would come off: ₩230,401, more than 3 times as much.

Same ₩1.3B assessed price, this year's tax

Including the rural development tax. Matches the Hometax simulator for the 2026 tax year.

  • Youngsook, one home · 65 · 10 years₩69,121
  • If Youngsook were 45 · 3 years₩230,401
  • Mikyung, ₩800M + ₩500M₩923,682

A couple splitting one home can apply to be treated as one person owning one home and get this credit. But then the deduction changes from ₩900M each to a single ₩1.2B, which can actually create a tax. Calculate both before applying.

That is the tax paid this December. On August 3, 2026 the government announced a plan to overhaul the tax from 2027, but it is a government proposal that has not passed the National Assembly. For someone who owns one home and lives in it, the deduction would rise from ₩1.2B to ₩1.4B, the ratio would rise from 60% to 70% or more, and the credit would be based on years actually lived there instead of years held. The numbers can change in the Assembly, so this page's calculation is for this year's bill; next year's must be redone once the law is final.

Two things to do now. First, look up this year's assessed price of your home on the official real estate price portal. Second, count how many homes your household owned on June 1. These figures follow the law as of October 2026 for the tax paid this December. The actual bill can differ slightly because of local reductions or the cap that keeps the tax from rising too much over the previous year, so check with the tax office if the amount is large. The gap between ₩69,121 and ₩923,682 came from the order of the calculation, not the price.

The legal basis

Drawn from government announcements and the statutes themselves as primary sources, covering only the relevant part.

종합부동산세법 제3조 · 제7조 (과세기준일 · 납세의무자)

In force In force (checked October 2026)

The assessment date is June 1, the same as property tax. Whoever owes residential property tax on that date owes this tax.

What this means

The owner on a single day, June 1, pays for the whole year. Collect the balance on May 31 and you do not pay; on June 2 and you do.

종합부동산세법 제8조 · 시행령 제2조의4 (과세표준)

In force In force (checked October 2026)

From each taxpayer's total assessed price of homes, deduct ₩900M (₩1.2B for a one-home household) and multiply by the 60/100 fair market value ratio.

What this means

The same ₩1.3B gives a ₩60M tax base for one home and ₩240M for two. Because it is per person, a couple splitting one ₩1.3B home has ₩650M each and pays ₩0.

종합부동산세법 제9조 · 시행령 제4조의3 (세율 · 재산세 공제 · 1세대 1주택자 세액공제)

In force In force (checked October 2026)

0.5% on a tax base up to ₩300M, up to 2.7% for two homes or fewer, up to 5% for three or more. The property tax attributable to the tax base is subtracted by the formula in Decree Art. 4-3. One-home households combine age (60+ 20% · 65+ 30% · 70+ 40%) and holding period (5 years 20% · 10 years 40% · 15 years 50%) for up to 80% off the tax.

What this means

Youngsook: ₩300,000 less ₩107,999 property tax, then 70% off, is ₩57,601. Mikyung: ₩1.2M less ₩430,265 is ₩769,735.

농어촌특별세법 제5조 · 종합부동산세법 제16조 (농어촌특별세 · 납부)

In force In force (checked October 2026)

20/100 of the tax is paid together as rural development tax. The tax is paid from December 1 to 15.

What this means

Adding ₩11,520 for Youngsook and ₩153,947 for Mikyung gives ₩69,121 and ₩923,682.

2026년 세제개편안의 종합부동산세 개편 (정부안 · 국회 통과 전)

In force Announced 2026-08-03 · targeted at tax liability arising on or after 2027-01-01 · not yet passed by the National Assembly

Raise the basic deduction for one-home owners who live in the home from ₩1.2B to ₩1.4B, raise the fair market value ratio from 60% to 70% or more, and base the one-home credit on years lived rather than years held.

What this means

A government proposal whose numbers can change in the Assembly. This page calculates the tax paid in December 2026 and does not include the proposal.

Run it on your own numbers

The calculator opens with these conditions already filled in. Change the figures and your own case comes straight out.

Open the Comprehensive Real Estate Tax

Frequently asked

I sold and collected the balance on May 31. Do I pay that year's tax?

No. The tax is paid by whoever owns the home on the June 1 assessment date, and on June 1 the owner is the buyer. Set the closing for June 2 instead and you pay a full year's tax on a home you sold one day later.

Is the tax based on market price?

No. It uses the official assessed price published every year, which is usually lower than the market price. You can look up this year's assessed price of your home on the official real estate price portal.

What if a married couple splits one ₩1.3B home?

The tax is calculated per person. Each share is ₩650M and ₩900M is deducted per person, so both pay ₩0. Applying to be treated as one person owning one home brings the credit, but the deduction becomes a single ₩1.2B and can create a tax, so calculate both.

I also pay property tax. Am I taxed twice on the same part?

No. The overlapping property tax is subtracted (Enforcement Decree Art. 4-3): ₩107,999 for one ₩1.3B home, ₩430,265 for two homes of ₩800M and ₩500M. In exchange, 20% of the tax is added as rural development tax.

What if Youngsook were 45 and had held only 3 years?

It goes up. Nothing comes off for age or holding period, so ₩192,001 plus ₩38,400 rural development tax is ₩230,401, more than 3 times as much.

The government announced a proposal in August 2026. Does this year's calculation change?

No. The August 3, 2026 proposal would take effect from 2027 and has not passed the National Assembly. For someone who owns one home and lives in it, it would raise ₩1.2B to ₩1.4B, 60% to 70% or more, and base the credit on years lived rather than years held, but the numbers can change in the Assembly. The tax paid this December follows current law.

Results are estimates based on the inputs and on the rules as at the stated date. They may differ from a lender's actual assessment, and the rules change often. Take professional advice before any decision that matters.