Korean Burdened Gift Calculator
Where a property is gifted along with a jeonse deposit or a mortgage, this works out both the gift tax and the capital gains tax.
One gift, two taxes
The gift
Result
The burdened gift is ₩72.5M cheaper. The two taxes come to ₩145.75M, against ₩218.25M for an outright gift.
Gift tax (paid by the recipient)
₩101.85M
₩600M treated as a gift
Capital gains tax (paid by the giver)
₩43.9M
₩400M treated as a sale
Both taxes together
₩145.75M
debt share 40%
Different people pay. The recipient pays the ₩101.85M of gift tax; the giver pays the ₩43.9M of capital gains tax. If the giver has no cash on hand, decide together where that money is coming from.
| Value of the property | ₩1B |
|---|---|
| Debt transferred | − ₩400M |
| Portion treated as a gift | ₩600M |
| Gift allowance | − ₩50M |
| Gift tax base | ₩550M |
| Gift tax | ₩101.85M |
| Sale proceeds attributed | ₩400M |
| Acquisition cost attributed | − ₩200M |
| Capital gain | ₩200M |
| Long-term holding deduction (20%) | − ₩40M |
| Annual capital gains allowance | − ₩2.5M |
| Capital gains tax base | ₩157.5M |
| Capital gains tax (incl. local surtax) | ₩43.9M |
| Both taxes together | ₩145.75M |
Based on 상속세 및 증여세법 제47조제1항 (deducting the debt) and 소득세법 시행령 제159조제1항 (the apportionment formula). The sale portion is split out by the ratio of debt to gift value. Between spouses or lineal relatives, the debt is not presumed to have actually been assumed (제47조제3항). It must be objectively verifiable, such as a bank loan or a lease contract, and the recipient must repay it from their own funds. The tax office checks the source of those repayments afterwards. Only the general long-term holding table is applied here; the one-house relief would require assessing the sale portion separately, so it is not covered. Acquisition tax is charged on top.
How this works
What it calculates
Handing a home to a child or spouse together with the mortgage or the tenant's deposit attached to it is called a burdened gift, 부담부증여. Two taxes arise, not one. The value left after the debt is a gift, so the recipient pays gift tax; the debt portion is treated as if the property had been sold for that amount, so the giver pays capital gains tax. This calculator works out both, then compares the total with the gift tax that would have been due on an outright gift with no debt attached, to show whether the burdened gift is actually worthwhile.
You enter the appraised value, the debt being transferred, what the giver originally paid, the relationship, the holding period and any gift received from the same person in the past ten years. The result shows gift tax, capital gains tax, the sum of the two and the difference against an outright gift.
Who uses it and when
Parents planning to pass a home to a child use it before the gift contract is signed. Gift tax is progressive, so attaching debt lowers the gift value, drops it into a lower bracket and cuts the gift tax sharply. Capital gains tax appears in its place, so the question is whether the two together come to less than an outright gift. If the home has not risen much since purchase the capital gain is small and the structure usually wins; if it has risen a lot, the capital gains tax can wipe out the saving.
It is also a way to sketch the picture before meeting a tax adviser. Because two different people pay the two taxes, the family needs to settle in advance who bears what, and the gift tax return is due within three months of the end of the month in which the gift is received.
Legal basis and how the maths runs
상속세 및 증여세법 제47조제1항 deducts the debt assumed by the recipient from the value of the gift, and 소득세법 제88조 treats that assumed debt as a sale for value. Under 소득세법 시행령 제159조 the sale price and the acquisition cost of the deemed sale are both apportioned by the share the debt bears to the whole value: if the debt is 40% of the value, 40% of the sale price and 40% of the original cost are carved out.
For the gift tax, the gift portion after removing the debt gets the relationship-based allowance, applied on a ten-year cumulative basis: ₩600 million for a spouse, ₩50 million for a gift from a parent to an adult child. The remaining base is taxed on a five-step progressive scale from 10% up to ₩100 million to 50% at the top, and filing on time earns a 3% credit against the computed tax.
For the capital gains tax, the apportioned cost is deducted from the apportioned sale price to get the gain, and a long-term holding deduction is taken. Only the general table is used here: 6% at three years, 20% at ten and 30% from fifteen. The annual basic deduction of ₩2.5 million comes off, the ordinary income tax scale is applied and 10% local income tax is added. The single-home exemption and its special deduction table are left out, because they would have to be tested separately on the deemed-sale portion alone.
A worked example
Take the default on screen. A home appraised at ₩1 billion carries ₩400 million of debt; the parents bought it for ₩500 million, held it for ten years and pass it to an adult child. The gift portion is ₩1 billion less ₩400 million, or ₩600 million, and after the ₩50 million allowance the base is ₩550 million. That sits in the 30% bracket, giving ₩105 million, and the 3% filing credit brings the gift tax to ₩101.85 million.
The deemed sale uses the 40% debt share: a sale price of ₩400 million, a cost of ₩200 million and a gain of ₩200 million. Ten years of holding takes 20% off, leaving ₩160 million; the ₩2.5 million basic deduction leaves a base of ₩157.5 million, the 38% rate less the progressive deduction gives ₩39.91 million, and local income tax lifts it to ₩43,901,000. The two taxes total ₩145,751,000. An outright gift of ₩1 billion would have cost ₩218.25 million in gift tax, so the burdened gift saves ₩72,499,000. Had the home been bought for ₩900 million the gain would shrink to ₩40 million, the capital gains tax to a little under ₩3.5 million, and the saving would exceed ₩110 million.
Common mistakes
The biggest mistake is forgetting the capital gains tax. People sign because the gift tax falls, then the parents receive a capital gains assessment the following May. The second is the reality of the debt. Between spouses or between parents and children the assumption of debt is not presumed, so the child must be able to show from bank records that they are actually paying the interest and principal. If the parents keep paying after the gift, the whole debt is recharacterised as a gift and penalty tax follows.
Entering a guessed purchase price is risky too. A home bought long ago has a low cost, which inflates the gain and can make the burdened gift worse than an outright one. Owners of several homes in an adjustment target area face heavier capital gains rates that push the figure well above what this calculator shows. Finally, this covers national taxes only. The recipient owes acquisition tax separately on the gift portion and on the deemed-purchase portion, and that calculation is a different one.
Last updated . Found something wrong? Tell us.
Common questions
- What is a burdened gift?
- Passing on property together with a jeonse deposit or a loan, so the recipient takes on the debt as well. Tax law splits it in two. The part matching the debt is treated as a sale and taxed as a capital gain, and the rest is treated as a gift.
- Why does the tax fall?
- Gift tax is progressive, so a smaller taxable amount drops you into a lower band. Gifting ₩1bn outright reaches the 30% band; attaching ₩400M of debt leaves only ₩600M taxed as a gift, in the 20% band. But capital gains tax arises on that ₩400M, so the two have to be added and compared.
- When does it work in your favour?
- The higher the giver's acquisition cost, the smaller the capital gain, and the better this works. Long ownership helps too, through the holding deduction. Conversely, a recently bought home that has risen sharply carries a large capital gain and can make this the worse option.
- Who pays which tax?
- The recipient pays gift tax; the giver pays capital gains tax. If the giver has no cash, the money for that tax has to be found separately. Missing this is a common and awkward surprise.
- Does it hold up between family members?
- Between spouses or lineal relatives, the debt is not presumed to have been assumed (상속세 및 증여세법 제47조제3항). It must be objectively verifiable, such as a bank loan or a lease contract, and the recipient must service it from their own funds. The tax office checks the source of those repayments afterwards.
- What about acquisition tax?
- It is charged separately. The debt portion takes the paid-acquisition rate and the rest takes the gift-acquisition rate. This calculator covers only gift tax and capital gains tax.
Work out an outright gift with no debt
Explainers that cover this
The assumptions and the statutes behind them, written out.
- One line about the tenant's deposit reshapes the tax — how the same ₩600M apartment became ₩101.85M or ₩67.05MA gift with assumed debt (burdened gift) splits one transfer in two: the debt the child takes over is treated as a sale, the rest as a gift. For a ₩600M home with a ₩300M lease deposit, bought for ₩300M and held 10 years, a plain gift's ₩101.85M of gift tax becomes ₩38.8M of gift tax plus ₩28.25M of capital gains tax, ₩67.05M in all, but a home with a large gain can go the other way. Between family members the debt assumption must be proven objectively, and the same proof governs acquisition tax.
- Gift a home with a tenant's deposit attached and the tax changes shape — the same ₩600M becomes ₩101.85M or ₩67.05MGifting a ₩600M apartment to a child outright means gift tax of ₩101.85M on the whole ₩600M. If the child takes over the ₩300M jeonse deposit, it is an encumbered gift: the ₩300M deposit counts as a sale and only the remaining ₩300M as a gift, giving ₩38.8M gift tax plus ₩28.25M capital gains tax, ₩67.05M in total. That is ₩34.8M less, for a home bought for ₩300M and held ten years.
Similar calculators
Not the one you were looking for? Switch here.
Does a number look wrong, or an explanation off? Report an error

